On 11:13 Thu 11 Oct , Tiziano Müller wrote: > Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein: > > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote: > > >> 1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild > > >> > > >> file : > > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r > > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain: > > >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r > > >>8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain > > >> > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch" > > >> > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch" > > >> epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch" > > > > > > This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching, > > > particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV > > > directory. > > > > dev-zero? > Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while > the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be > separated. > And I don't see any reason to start renaming now.
Oh, I would've expected upstream patches to be in SRC_URI ... Thanks, Donnie -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
