On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Tiziano M�ller wrote:
Am Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2007 14.56:24 schrieb Doug Goldstein:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 22:01 Mon 08 Oct , Doug Goldstein (cardoe) wrote:
1.1 sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r8.ebuild
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
8.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup plain:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/evms/evms-2.5.5-r
8.ebuild?rev=1.1&content-type=text/plain
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/md_super_fix.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/ntfs_unmkfs.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_degrade_fix_v2.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_remove_spare_fix_2.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/raid5_algorithm.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_reload_options.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/cli_query_segfault.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/get_geometry.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/BaseName.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${PV}/disk_cache.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-as-needed.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-glib_dep.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-ocfs2.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-use_disk_group.patch"
epatch "${FILESDIR}/${P}-pagesize.patch"
This would be another good candidate for using epatch's bulk patching,
particularly if you moved the last group of patches into the PV
directory.
dev-zero?
Nope. The stuff in ${PV} are the patches upstream has on their servers, while
the others are mostly Gentoo-specific or something else. So I want them to be
separated.
And I don't see any reason to start renaming now.
Still no good reason not to just call epatch once:
epatch \
list \
of \
patches \
here
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
