Hi! On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Tobias Klausmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > > > > tetex-alike distribution. So, imho, in that case a kpathsea > > > > useflag would make more sense; but I doubt such a useflag name > > > > will speak by itself. > > > Yes, we should introduce tex, latex and kpathsea USE flags. > > > Anyone? > > As long as the description of the USE flag (such as by euse -i) > > is usefule (and *not* the equally omnipresentand useless "foo - > > enables foo support"), I see no trouble in using it. > > In this case I'd go for: > > kpathsea - Enable (La)TeX integration. > > Which I don't consider as correct: "enable integration with kpathsea > search library (TeX related)" > > > IMHO, it'd better be "Support X11 DGA video output using the > > vidix interface" > > Right, we have too many bad descriptions. Maybe a project for you > to prepare a patch for use*.desc? :)
Actually, I might consider it. Unfortunately, I tried to cut off my finger last sunday and as such I'm typing-impaired for now. At least I got sick leave until Friday :-/ And two nasty tetanus shots :-( <cue more whining, I'm too lazy to type> Anyway, I'm considering your "offer" :) Regards, Tobias -- In the future, everyone will be anonymous for 15 minutes. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list