Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:38:08 +0100 > Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Just to have it spelt out, what you suggest here is that EAPI has a >> single value, a word or a number, that refers to a set of "features >> and rules", if I understand correctly. >> >> With this way of using EAPI I fail to see why EAPIs aren't orderable. >> Even with the example you gave in the previous mail, it looks like a >> perfect succession of EAPIs. > > It doesn't *have* to be a perfect succession. It's entirely possible > that there will be, say, two divergent EAPI branches or even that there > will be a completely unrelated new EAPI format. >
What's the point in having such thing? lu -- Luca Barbato Gentoo Council Member Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
