On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:18:28 +0100 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It doesn't *have* to be a perfect succession. It's entirely possible > > that there will be, say, two divergent EAPI branches or even that > > there will be a completely unrelated new EAPI format. > > > What's the point in having such thing?
The most likely case: if it's decided to have a substantially different new EAPI and incompatible for adding lots of shiny new things like multiABI, whilst keeping the existing EAPI series and extending it for people who don't have time to convert their packages to the new format. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
