On Saturday 22 of December 2007 02:41:02 Petteri Räty wrote: > Piotr Jaroszyński kirjoitti: > > This GLEP proposes usage of EAPI-suffixed file extensions for ebuilds > > (for example, foo-1.2.3.ebuild-1). > > It seems many people don't like the idea of having it in the filename
Seems you are counting the posts, not the people. > but how about having subdirectories for different eapis. This should > even be faster for the package manager as it can just ignore the > directories it can't understand instead of having to parse the file names. It was already proposed, but didn't seem to get much support. It is equivalent to using the suffixes, but I see it rather as perfomarnce hit, not improvement. The package manger would have to look for ebuilds in the main dir and all the subdirs in case it doesn't have/can't use the cache. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
