On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:55:50 +0800 Zhang Le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Note *the way things are currently*. If you think this is untrue, > > provide an algorithm that will correctly give the EAPI of any > > current or future ebuild given that ebuild's filename (hint: you > > can't). > > Simple. > Whatever you'd like to have in the suffix, we can put it on the first > line of the ebuild. > Just go and get it, and that's the EAPI.
Your algorithm: Does not work for existing ebuilds that have implicit EAPI 0. Does not work for existing ebuilds that have explicit EAPI. Does not work for future ebuilds. That's nought for three. -- Ciaran McCreesh -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
