On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 06:01:04PM +0800, Zhang Le wrote: > > > > Your algorithm: > > > > Does not work for existing ebuilds that have implicit EAPI 0. > > That's obvious. If no suffix, just treat it as EAPI 0. > I thought I don't need to say this explicitly.
'# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation' Is that an EAPI? of course it is not, are you going to hardcode every possible ebuild header in your stupid _hack_ ? > > > > Does not work for existing ebuilds that have explicit EAPI. > > Even better, since we don't need suffix in the first place. Just define it in > ebuild. What? > > > > Does not work for future ebuilds. > > If defined in file does not work, then define in file name doesn't either. > They are interchangeable. No, they are not. > All could be get before sourcing. > I know you'd say people will use all syntaxes to define. But how many are > there? EAPI=1, EAPI="1" these are the two ways currently used in tree. > A simple qgrep can show that. > Two steps can guarantee you get the value > 1. strip " > 2. get the value And then you are stuck FOREVER into defining EAPI as a variable. You clearly haven't read anything on this thread. I suggest you go and do so before making a fool of yourself again. Please. Please guys, keep in mind that the fact that some of you understand what a filename is and are able to provide simple commands that extract a particular line from a file does not entitle you with the knowdledge required to contribute something useful to this discussion. - ferdy -- Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín 20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4
pgpq7ujd1zNsE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
