On 12/30/07, Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a very very rough draft/question about how we should move > forward with USE flag documentation and specification. The entire idea > of a single USE flag having different meanings will need to be revisted > later. I just want to get an idea of how we can document these > different meanings. Please read my ideas here: > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~halcy0n/gleps/glep-0054.html > > Let me know if you like any of those ideas, or if they all suck (and if > they do, you better tell me why). I'm not sure which is the best way > forward, which is why I want everyone to contribute towards the best > solution moving forward. I really don't want to be stuck with something > that is going to end up being a pain a year down the road. > > Thanks, >
One of the GLEP's primary goals is to provide a global use flag definition and over-ride it with a local definition. How does putting all flags in use.desc and over-riding local flags in use.local.desc not accomplish this? How does the glep intend to handle USE_EXPAND? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
