On 21:37 Mon 18 Feb , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:20:52 -0800 > Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This seems like something ewarn should do on its own. > > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140
Alright, so portage has put this stuff to stderr since January 4. Then why are we also adding workarounds to individual eclasses? > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass?rev=1.121&view=markup I'm not sure what I'm supposed to get out of this, besides seeing that a lot of stuff is sent to stderr. > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/194929 Right, I figured the reason was something along the lines of info going to stdout when only flags should. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
