On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 13:54:34 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/bin/isolated-functions.sh?r1=9118&r2=9140
> 
> Alright, so portage has put this stuff to stderr since January 4.
> Then why are we also adding workarounds to individual eclasses?

How many people are running a Portage version released after January 4?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to