-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 8 Jun 2008 11:12:27 +0200 "Piotr Jaroszyński" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, > > looks like every nominee wants the council to be more technical so I > have a few technical questions for you: > > 1. GLEP54 > 2. GLEP55 > 3. Most wanted changes in future EAPIs > > [1] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0054.html > [2] - http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0055.html > > -- > Best Regards, > Piotr Jaroszyński > [Error decoding BASE64] Sorry to disappoint you. If you get me on council, I'm going to ask for a recommendation and follow it unless it looks ridiculous. For the GLEPs you mentioned, unless someone came forward otherwise, I'd approve them out of hand. As for future EAPIs, that is not a council matter that I can see. Why on earth can't that be done at the level of those who care? I.e., people who implement package managers or want EAPIs. It seems to me all we want is consistency, and council's job is to put package manager people into a room and tell them not to come out until they agree on something. If I'm a councilor, I really don't care what that is. I'll listen to what you want for future EAPIs, but I don't think it's council's job to decide. Regards, Ferris - -- Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel, Userrel, Trustees) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhLqJMACgkQQa6M3+I///frwQCg3SmJMu9K9x3hjpx0jcc0tOBy YpIAn2DS+YeYw016hoebhIyLKtbu80tE =qDAl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ���^�X��� ��(��&j)b� b�
