Peter Weller wrote: > On Sun, 2008-06-08 at 13:41 +0100, Alex Howells wrote: > [snip] >> I often don't agree with him, but can't help but respect the work he >> does. >> >> I would like to see Council move towards a more compressed meeting >> format -- people presenting arguments need to work out their stuff >> before bringing it up in the meeting, and to allow for quick >> turn-around of decisions I'd suggest fortnightly meetings which are >> time-limited to 60 minutes each. A prioritized schedule determines >> which order we deal with issues in and anything not getting attention >> is bumped 2 weeks, with the priority adjusted if necessary to ensure >> it gets attention then. >> >> Each issue should be limited to between 5-20 minutes. If people can't >> get through the politics and debate in the allotted time then it >> should either get bumped 2 weeks and given another 5-20 minutes, or we >> should table a special meeting to allow a full 60-90 minutes *just* to >> decide that one issue and nothing else. >> >> Sitting around in #gentoo-council for 3-4 hours every month isn't >> conducive to progress, it's going to make people get tired/bored and >> not pay proper attention and/or not bother to turn up, which just >> leads to elections. Endless cycle? > > ++ From me on this one. If I were elected to the Council, I would do my > best to get this happening.
++ from me too. Along the lines to what I wrote in gentoo.project. -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list