On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:12:47 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Package manager maintainers refusing to do basic testing before > > claiming support for a new EAPI has very messy consequences. If > > package manager maintainers aren't going to do the responsible > > thing, the whole point of EAPIs is lost. > > Thats a circular argument since portage and pkgcore developers are > complaining about eapi definition and PMS management.
Are you seriously suggesting that the portage and pkgcore developers think that they should be able to release a package manager that claims to support an EAPI when it in fact doesn't? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
