On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Ciaran McCreesh > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:11:18 -0700 >> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> GLEP 55: On hold pending a concrete requirement for it. GLEP 54 may >>> be, but that's unclear until it's been revised. >> >> Which part of the 'Problem' section in the GLEP didn't you understand? >> Do you seriously consider not being able to add or change global scope >> functions in future EAPIs to be a non-issue, or were you ignoring those >> two bullet points? > > I understood both. > > As far as could be determined by the members at the meeting there no > compelling examples in Gentoo who to change or add global scope functions > in future EAPIs. As such those problems as stated are not in scope for Gentoo > because Gentoo is not attempting to do those things at this time.
ugh, s/who// > >> >> -- >> Ciaran McCreesh >> > -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
