-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joe Peterson wrote: > Yes, that's sort of what I am thinking. Migrate options that really do > not belong in RESTRICT to another variable (and keep them in RESTRICT, > of course, for backward compat for now). Then introduce new ones into > whichever variable makes sense.
Personally I think people are far too concerned about the name of the variable. I only see a what I consider to be a trivial or negligible benefit in separating these things into two different variables. However, it it makes more people happy then I guess I'm for it. Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkiWKJMACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOtxwCdHWWJ9sFaVsSiQF36j1WDmJOY Vf8AmgP9MlJGdQC5jzgGkjdUqmv+Y+F8 =WWt3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
