On Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:22:09 +0100
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 22:06:40 +0100
> > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Have a look at, for example, [1], where Mike already gave you an
> >> > answer one of the previous times we discussed it.
> >> >
> >> I'm aware of the prior discussion.
> >> Re-read it, and tell me what it breaks, if you can.
> > 
> > Well, which part of the previous times it's been explained to you
> > didn't you understand?
> > 
> No one has ever given me a technical reason. I thought you might have
> light to shed; clearly not.
> 
> Please don't reply to my posts if you don't have any actual
> information to add; I realise you like long fruitless mail
> 'discussions', and apparently have lots of time for them, but I
> don't, and I don't enjoy reading them either. This kind of one-liner
> with zero content, and no intent but to insult, should simply be
> binned without sending imo.

Okay, Steve, stop.  I don't think you realize it, but you are trolling
this list.  Every second post is you and Ciaran bitching at each other
or you complaining about every single thing we do that you
don't personally like.  We appreciate your input, but please respect our
right to do things the way we think is best for us, even if they aren't
aligned to your personal preferences.


-- 
gcc-porting,                                      by design, by neglect
treecleaner,                              for a fact or just for effect
wxwidgets @ gentoo     EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to