On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:53:27 +0100
Maciej Mrozowski <reave...@poczta.fm> wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 of December 2008 15:33:14 Fabio Rossi wrote:
> > Ok, but at the end we have an exception in the tree
> > (/var/lib/gentoo/news/) which is not justified (looking at the
> > current discussion). My proposal has arisen after having seen
> > the /var/lib/gentoo/news/ hierarchy.
> 
> Then it seems way more appropriate and easier to implement to force
> Gentoo news to comply to FHS and shot on sight those responsible for
> this mess :D

Gentoo does not comply with the FHS. It was established a long time ago
that FHS is considered silly and any compliance is merely because the
FHS people somehow managed to avoid screwing that particular area up.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to