On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 19:58 +0100, Rémi Cardona wrote: > Le 01/02/2009 18:32, Norberto Bensa a écrit : > > Excuse me for thread hijack. > > > > Would it make sense to add (for example): > > > > gnome-games > > gnome-games is already the name of a package that contains all official > GNOME games. Only a handful are also released and packaged separately. > > Useless for us IMHO.
That said, I'm still threatening to split gnome-games up to individual packages one rainy day. But if that goes through (time-wise and has team agreement), the individual games would be in the suitable games-* category (games-arcade, games-board, etc) with a gnome-extra/gnome-games still in place (one day gnome-base/) - newer versions being meta packages pulling in the individual official games. And not in a gnome-games/ category. Then you can find gnome-games meta package from gnome-*/ category and individual games in their suitable category (glchess is a cool board game, etc).. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
