Stelian Ionescu wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
>> keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
>> neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script
>> and the list of ebuilds is attached. I plan on removing all these
>> ebuilds two weeks from now unless a reason is given why not to. If you
>> see an ebuild on the list that should be kept, please migrate it to EAPI
>> 2. If you need assistance in migrating, I can help. With these gone
>> built_with_use usage will be down to about 600:
> 
> built_with_use shouldn't be removed until EAPI=3 gets approved because
> currently there's no good way to emulate "--missing true|false|die"
> yes, I can use something like this in sbcl:
> || ( <sys-libs/glibc-2.6[nptl] >=sys-libs/glibc-2.6 )
> but not all its use cases may be this simple
> 

Even this is wrong because:

betelge...@pena ~ $ portageq metadata / ebuild sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10 IUSE
nls

For most packages old versions are not kept around so just doing
>=cat/foo-X.Y[use] is fine and EAPI 3 is not needed. I haven't come
across a case that couldn't be done with EAPI 2 yet. Granted the atoms
can be a bit cleaner with EAPI 3 but considering how much zmedico slacks
in implementing it, it's best to do migrating now with EAPI 2 than EAPI
3 in the far future.

Regards,
Petteri

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to