On Thursday 14 January 2010 18:25:35 Petteri Räty wrote: > On 01/15/2010 12:54 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > That top item is the largest blocker. The actual conversion time is down > > to 9 hours, but with more than that again in setting it up. I'd like to > > get the conversion time down to UNDER 4 hours. It's mostly > > single-threaded, and we've got lots of cores available, it just needs > > parallelization. We're basically dead in the water during the > > conversion, there is NO incremental support at all. > > Is a day really an issue? If there's something extremely urgent while > the conversion is going on, you can just turn CVS back on and then let's > try again some other day.
indeed ... we've already tolerated long downtimes in different infrastructure pieces in our history. devs can live with advertised downtimes since the timing is known. it's the unknown/indefinite things that annoy people. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
