On 02/03/10 13:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >>>>>> > >> To make naming a bit more consistent, how about: >> - BUGDAY-CANDIDATE >> - BUGDAY-ACCEPTED >> - BUGDAY-REFUSED >> > >> They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not have them crippled >> down to stuff like "BDYES", "BDNO" and "BDMAYBE". >> > This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for > supplementary information "Status Whiteboard" could be used. > > Ulrich > > I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient, and more information can be provided elsewhere in the report.
--Zach
