On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:47:27 +0200 Maciej Mrozowski <reave...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, seriously - given the fact that some of my packages were even > stabilized without contacting me (app-misc/hal-cups-utils, > app-admin/system-config- printer-common) - I think it should be:
Well you'd marked them "~arch", right? That means they're candidates to go stable. > * solely up to the package maintainers to stabilize application on > arches they're using or on any arch if package is arch-agnostic > (optionally, but preferably with some peer review from other project > members or arch team members). There are no arch agnostic packages. > It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some > random php/perl library that's known to work. How do you know it works if you don't test on the arch in question? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
