-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dne 28.3.2010 09:39, Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): > On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 07:47:27 +0200 > Maciej Mrozowski <reave...@gmail.com> wrote: >> No, seriously - given the fact that some of my packages were even >> stabilized without contacting me (app-misc/hal-cups-utils, >> app-admin/system-config- printer-common) - I think it should be: > > Well you'd marked them "~arch", right? That means they're candidates to > go stable. > Yes, but last time i checked we have consensus that archies should wait onto maintainer to request the stabling. >> * solely up to the package maintainers to stabilize application on >> arches they're using or on any arch if package is arch-agnostic >> (optionally, but preferably with some peer review from other project >> members or arch team members). > > There are no arch agnostic packages. I can find some, for example kde-l10n O:P But you are right. > >> It's really freaking silly to wait months for stabilization of some >> random php/perl library that's known to work. > > How do you know it works if you don't test on the arch in question? >
Basically you are saying that NONE tested that package on the arch until the stablerequest. That's quite wrong and it should mean that the arch should be ~ only, since they are stabling packages that they first tested the day they stable them. Tomas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuvKa0ACgkQHB6c3gNBRYdaWACdGP3EvuvL3+GVXI8GBsU3fHqj Kq8AoJMyVDS8P0vCXfwJuGIIEQHWPgUL =CO3D -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
