El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:43 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El dom, 13-06-2010 a las 14:16 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió: > > On 06/11/2010 12:27 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > > > > > From my point of view, I would prefer to: > > > 1. Mask "caps" for net-wireless/bluez on affected arches, letting us to > > > keep bluez keyworded. > > > 2. Open two bug reports as done with current policy: one for keywording > > > libcap-ng and other to check bluez works ok with it asking arch team to > > > unmask that USE flag if possible. > > > > > > > There's nothing preventing you from already doing this. package.use.mask > > is something package maintainers themselves should be looking after for > > their packages. > > > > Regards, > > Petteri > > > > > OK, thanks a lot :-D
The problem is that hppa team seems to not allow others than they to edit their package.use.mask :-/, is there any special reason for it?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
