El lun, 14-06-2010 a las 04:59 +0200, Jeroen Roovers escribió: > What is the problem? The files in place ask you to file a bug report > instead of fiddling with the files yourselves. I put that in place > because I got (fucking) tired of seeing the after effects of people > fiddling with the arch profile files without 1) consideration, 2) > informing the involved arch team. What do you expect? File a bloody bug > report detailing the (commit) problem you are facing and you will > probably see 1) response and 2) cooperation. If you fuck around with > the arch profile files without doing any of that, you will face 1) a > lack of willingness to cooperate and 2) evil wrath. > > > Regards, > jer
The problem is that, at least regarding gnome related bugs, there are a lot of keywords dropped for your arch that could be prevented use.masking an USE, like, for example, dev-util/anjuta-2.28*, that is causing us to preserve and old (and broken) 2.24 release only for hppa. My intention is only to try to help you and improve the situation, I also have opened bug reports for every change have committed to, for example, powerpc profiles (you will see that I edited your profile yesterday, but it was because I totally missed the note preventing us to do that, this is why I didn't committed any more changes and sent reply above; it wasn't premeditated) Would you allow me to edit hppa package.use.mask *if I open corresponding bug report* ? Thanks :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
