On 23 June 2010 01:47, Mike Auty <ike...@gentoo.org> wrote: [...] >> Which should not be an issue since any library that has some sort of >> introspection can use this flag (and the use.desc can be changed >> appropriately at that time if it does not use gobject-introspection). > > Why have to change it in the future (and probably split it into two > flags then), when the choice hasn't been made yet? Or, to put your own > question to you, why are you vehemently for "introspection" when others > have shown concern with the choice? As far as I can see, the only > difference is requiring a slightly longer use_enable line.
Mostly because I don't want to coin a new term if it's not absolutely necessary. That said, you're right - more people seem to be comfortable with "gintrospection" than plain "introspection". If no further objections arise, we'll go with "gintrospection". Thanks, -- Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)
