Il giorno dom, 31/10/2010 alle 20.09 +0100, Thomas Beierlein ha scritto: > > If I read the discussion correctly we will still need to keep > these .la > files around. > Most likely, yes… you can go a bit deeper about them (for instance PulseAudio can load its plugins with libltdl even if the .la files are not around, and the author _always_ recommended removing them), but that's probably something we don't have to care about so much as it is.
For what concerns the list I provided, that's just the output of the tinderbox in the case of hamlib, it was _Hamlib.la that triggered it, it is installed in the Python tree and Python does not use .la files. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — “Flameeyes” http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ If you found a .asc file in this mail and know not what it is, it's a GnuPG digital signature: http://www.gnupg.org/
