-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:15:17 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 31/10/2010 alle 20.09 +0100, Thomas Beierlein ha > scritto: > > > > If I read the discussion correctly we will still need to keep > > these .la > > files around. > > > Most likely, yes… you can go a bit deeper about them (for instance > PulseAudio can load its plugins with libltdl even if the .la files are > not around, and the author _always_ recommended removing them), but > that's probably something we don't have to care about so much as it > is. > Anyway, I will look into it and try it out. > For what concerns the list I provided, that's just the output of the > tinderbox in the case of hamlib, it was _Hamlib.la that triggered it, > it is installed in the Python tree and Python does not use .la files. > Ok. Thnaks for the info. Another one will be libhamlib.la as it works with pkg-config - so no need for it. Regards, Thomas. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzN3JcACgkQQe4uqXYgU9WejwCdFbv1YtXLgunYF0FVXyZWJUmA 2igAn2XloPLjVitP0n0Sh3f9oDi3LOue =asZZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----