On Tuesday, November 23, 2010 01:36:15 Graham Murray wrote: > Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> writes: > > well, not quite. the way we agreed in the past was to not revbump the > > masked package, but once it was unmasked, we revbump it just once at > > that point. > > Is there somewhere which tells users when there are upgrades to > toolchain packages which are not revbumped once they have been unmasked > and in ~arch?
if they arent revbumped, then the changes dont matter to you > A case in point, glibc-2.12.1-r3. When I rebuilt this following the > merging of linux-headers-2.6.36, the rebuilt downloaded about 700K of > patches. irrelevant to your KEYWORD -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
