-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dne 25.1.2011 13:25, Markos Chandras napsal(a): > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:13:06PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >> How about creating a project (possibly a subproject of QA or something >> else) that would help people do that? In case of no response from >> maintainers just do your job, and that should get the tree converted >> more quickly than setting a policy. > Please don't! QA is way too understaffed. We ain't gonna convert any > ebuilds. This has nothing to do with QA. Let maintainers handle this Pavel does not ask for us to migrate the ebuilds, but the eclasses, wich we do anyway now :) >> >> My main point is that said "X should be Y" does not automatically make >> it so. We'd have to think about the migration plan anyway. >> >> Paweł >> > @Tomas, I don't follow. You mean migrate existing ebuilds or use the > latest EAPI from now on? > God no, when you do bump you use new eapi :) not retroactively revert all ebuilds to latest.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0+wtoACgkQHB6c3gNBRYe0lACeI/ir1DEcoxIpL/l0TEjDr5IZ smQAn2ydpf013aaqR94t7A6MYb7nkslF =j9iM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
