On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:32:27PM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Dne 25.1.2011 13:25, Markos Chandras napsal(a): > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 01:13:06PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > >> How about creating a project (possibly a subproject of QA or something > >> else) that would help people do that? In case of no response from > >> maintainers just do your job, and that should get the tree converted > >> more quickly than setting a policy. > > Please don't! QA is way too understaffed. We ain't gonna convert any > > ebuilds. This has nothing to do with QA. Let maintainers handle this > Pavel does not ask for us to migrate the ebuilds, but the eclasses, wich > we do anyway now :) Then I am sorry > >> > >> My main point is that said "X should be Y" does not automatically make > >> it so. We'd have to think about the migration plan anyway. > >> > >> Paweł > >> > > @Tomas, I don't follow. You mean migrate existing ebuilds or use the > > latest EAPI from now on? > > > God no, when you do bump you use new eapi :) not retroactively revert > all ebuilds to latest. Ok that works for me. As Alex said, maybe a repoman warning would be a good start
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ > > iEYEARECAAYFAk0+wtoACgkQHB6c3gNBRYe0lACeI/ir1DEcoxIpL/l0TEjDr5IZ > smQAn2ydpf013aaqR94t7A6MYb7nkslF > =j9iM > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Key ID: B4AFF2C2 Key FP: 660A 0742 84EC 26F1 9EDB F00A FA83 5A15 B4AF F2C2
pgpxStDexDgXj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
