W dniu 02.02.2011 08:59, Nikos Chantziaras pisze:
> It seems that KDE 4.6 is still hard-masked for x86 and amd64 because
> it's waiting for ppc and ppc64 keywords. I believe it would be
> beneficial for people if they wouldn't have to wait for arches that
> don't affect them at all.
>
> It seems better if the packages can be unmasked for x86 and amd64 and
> only kept hard-masked for ppc/ppc64 while they wait for keywords.
> Otherwise, all arches will feel the effect of the slowest one without
> there being a need for this.
>
>
I don't know what gave you the idea that ppc* has anything to do with
masking/unmasking of KDE-4.6. Just 2 facts:
1) you can unmask anything by using /etc/portage/package.unmask,
therefore nothing can ever hold *you* back
2) arches already have independent package.mask files, see
${PORTDIR}/profiles/arch/powerpc/package.mask for an example.Best regards, Kacper Kowalik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
