On 03/28/2011 12:32 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Rémi Cardona wrote:
>> Le 27/03/2011 10:36, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
>>> Also, both udisks and upower now have blockers for sys-apps/hal to
>>> prevent overlapping features.
>>
>> I know you want to kill HAL with a vengeance. I don't disagree with the
>> ultimate goal but I think you've gone too far.
>>
>> HAL and u{power,disks} are _perfectly_ parallel installable and there
>> are absolutely _no_ conflicts between the two.
>>
>> Blockers should be used for _file_ conflicts, not for _feature_
>> conflicts, otherwise we'd have to mask and get rid of half (or even
>> more) of all the packages we provide in portage.
>
> latest pciutils blocks hal, so i think that should cover the "urge
> people to migrate" aspect in ~arch
> -mike
>
I've changed this to be a bit more friendly.
As you pointed out, pciutils is one.
And ~arch version of upower is second.
KDE really needs to step up and get KDE 4.6.x stabilization bug open,
and this non-issue would become moot ;-)
