On Sonntag, 24. April 2011, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:43:16 +0200 > > Matthias Schwarzott <z...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Sounds like we should fix udev ebuild and some ebuilds installing > > udev rules to not use /$(get_libdir)/udev, but plain /lib/udev. > > > > I used that in believe that /lib is identical or links > > to /$(get_libdir) and multilib-strict requires it, but it seems to be > > intelligent enough to only deny 64-bit libs to go to /lib. > > > > So proper udev should use /lib/udev, correct? > > Do you really think it'd be fine for some systems to possibly > have /lib64 and /lib with random different contents?
Regarding /lib64/udev vs. /lib/udev: I think it is fine for some time. Having some rules only in /lib64/udev when udevd looks info /lib/udev will make only these things break that depend on the extra rules. The main question is: How many systems are affected by this /lib64 is not the same as /lib ? Matthias
