On 27.06.2011 15:28, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > So I know a bunch of people have already looked at it, and I'd like to > know: what do you find better about the Ruby approach compared to the > Python approach? Is it just the size of python.eclass, or are there a > number of other issues? >
I like the ruby approach for the reason that it doesn't require users to run update scripts like python-updater. Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
