-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 08/07/2011 12:09 ??, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 8.7.2011 11.55, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>>>>> In [1] it is noted that the 'useq' and 'hasq' functions are
>>>>> "Deprecated". If this is the case, do we think it would be
>>>>> pertinent to have a repoman warning reminding people to switch to
>>>>> 'use' and 'has' respectively?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds good. One thing we could consider in future EAPIs is starting
>>>> to make deprecated functions die and then remove in the one after.
>>
>> And what would be the advantage of removing these functions? They have
>> zero maintenance cost (as already stated previously, see below).
>>
> 
> Making sure people don't use them and through that removing the need to
> know what the two functions do from new people.
> 
> Regards,
> Petteri
> 
> 
> 
I believe that make them die wont improve anything but instead this will
bring more frustration to our users. If you make them die you transfer
the problem to the users, cause you make them file bugs and wait for
slacking maintainers to fix the packages. I would say to keep the
warning as it and hope that maintainers will actually step up and update
their packages.

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=i0CL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to