-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/2011 01:19 μμ, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 13:16:02 +0300 > Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> Uhm, no. The "make them die" would be done on an EAPI bump, so users >>> won't be affected. >>> >>> You *do* test things before committing, right? > >> I wouldn't expect this answer from you given your experience in Gentoo >> development and its internals. You know that people do EAPI bumps >> without proper testing or without taking into consideration the >> features included in each EAPI. > > You mean to say that you think Gentoo developers are lazy and > incompetent? > > Because, uh, if that's seriously what you're suggesting, then we have > bigger problems. > Seems like you are looking for a flame. All I am saying is that EAPI bump does not always protect users. We have 5 EAPIs around, so it is quite easy to get confused about the features each of the EAPIs includes. This is why I suggest to keep the warning around long enough, and when the number of affected packages drops below 'X', have the QA team fix the rest of them.
- -- Regards, Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOFtvuAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCluwP/Ao6g4/KUCw7JNvzK4yYQSRj abDwSXpQD3IE+WVuoS6Utgm8AWsj/BDDVNYgnPcAKGfh7Ki3JPtcC+sIQWRo7wsI eyNyYbUUg+YKQaxdaHQjNFc6HLDpufRHFY7j0LdfSdVe8jU3BAn3sX0dIRETUqW5 SKMNCtOOn6GkrfjuV5xDQyJD4Eg0YkuDur0Fuzk9YWUKM07ztjIwu0ZIwWmZg80e bEEC9TMlqth0oBu2fztfkyFB938Fs+IvuSO0TLZYHxhGXv4I9oXRfyZrndGF1ara tfF7fUifQGF7KHVTq6ZUYzLs86KqfYi4nQw4MQa4c5cFHQx3TAliUHuUlhXFgsAf pEUh3H3+nfBBuXW9axPlGc2rwjXm+byAMvc3VVjsnEHBTj7yqKHLGRhECWCQGfOj 2hiTblgJUdyt1bqEQZxdumaj7tQjXK6R+d3iXgUUf4LRQ4KyPiJGDke0yJhW57cH 4G8Ow/YBuZU9bpfafoC8CXzW5tJZoAoT8JkGUYy84aCNkVWf3Jb+bBl1/phWlg1g ReizZgs/Z59Sdx5ne5gxj4jgnOcx2cgna9Wcw+esi1AxqIGfxOtR+Az8P4iMzNvq DrZHWdGy1AvULPCmCocHzy7bpoi8xSDhsGt48+gAIix5yr8YP1dKGdVziEuKVtfF IdiCAe3VbbKB55BNGNmS =bst3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
