On Thu, 1 Sep 2011 15:27:12 +0200 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Michał Górny wrote: > > > I think the way to go would be to reimplement it completely. Maybe > > just put dobashcomp() and newbashcomp() functions in eutils (to not > > collide) and deprecate bash-completion.eclass? > > I'd rather keep this in a separate bash-completion-2.eclass. > We shouldn't start moving all do* and new* functions from other > eclasses to eutils, but keep it somewhat modular. So, here it goes. However, I'm not sure if that even deserves a dedicated function as the destination is pretty constant. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
bash-completion-r1.eclass
Description: Binary data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
