On Sat, 2011-09-10 at 11:22 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote: > On 10/09/2011 11:15 πμ, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > I would say that each package needs to have at least one herd or > > maintainer (which may be maintainer-needed or maintainer-wanted). > > > Well, you can easily assign your packages to dozen of herds and still > be the only one who touches them. So what's the point? Just to pretend > that the package is supported by an entire herd? >
I don't think that's what Mike was trying to say. He prolly wanted to say that it's required to have at least one of <maintainer> or <herd>, i.e. having one tag for m-n or the real maintainer is enough (no extra no-herd entry). Sounds pretty reasonable to me.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
