Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> said: > On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 17:54:06 +0200 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 10 Sep 2011 11:22:16 +0300 > > Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > On 10/09/2011 11:15 πμ, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > For example, in IRC, willikins tries to look up the members of > > > > "no-herd" when you do !meta -v because the bot lacks a special > > > > exception for this odd-ball value. > > > Just because willikins behaves like that does not justify the > > > removal of this tag. God knows how many utilites and scripts are > > > out there using the no-herd tag from metadata. > > > > There's, of course, metadata.dtd too but repoman re-fetches it on > > a regular basis so that's no problem. > > Ah, my bad. Our metadata DTD doesn't enforce existence of any <herd/> > tag. Neither does repoman. So, it's just that one webpage which says > there must be one.
You might want to check out the discussion on https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279206 -- Mark Loeser email - halcy0n AT gentoo DOT org email - mark AT halcy0n DOT com web - http://www.halcy0n.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
