On Saturday 12 November 2011 17:24:08 Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 11/11/11 16:44, Zac Medico wrote: > >> good point. we don't want to punish old portage users. let's enable it > >> by default in portage itself then. just add `elog` output to the > >> portage ebuild to inform users of the change ? or do we want a news > >> item ? > >> > >> what's the flag to negate the default ? --no-quiet-build ? ;) > > > > It's --quiet-build=n. I've gone ahead and enabled it for release in > > portage-2.1.10.34: > > > > http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=0cc1 > > 74b6fc28feb26ea151d76f794e0ff2c2fa39 > > Lots of people in #gentoo are unhappy with it.
most changes people will be unhappy with because it's different > Most devs will be unhappy as it makes it harder to view the log while > building. devs are not the normal case. it's trivial to have them use --quiet-build=n in their default emerge opts. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
