On Wednesday 18 January 2012 22:41:26 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > - you're confusing the literal @system with implicit system deps > > I don't quite follow here. By "implicit system deps", are you > referring to the "common sense" set of essential packages that you > have floating around in that brain of yours? :)
this policy predates me, and i'm not the only one supporting it (i've had almost no hand in the construction of any part of the devmanual for examle). i might have a pretty good idea of what things entail now, but that's purely a matter of me staring at the guts of the core system for so long. at this point, things can probably be enumerate a bit more clearly due to the slow culling of less important packages from @system. i'd have to noodle. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
