El dom, 15-04-2012 a las 19:10 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió: > On 04/15/2012 06:47 PM, Marcin Mirosław wrote: > > W dniu 2012-04-14 13:02, Pacho Ramos pisze: > >> Hello > >> > >> From time to time I see old bug reports that are still wrongly > >> opened and referring to old packages no longer in the tree. Would > >> be possible to add a way to periodically check for bugs referring > >> in summary to obsolete packages and, then, allow us to have a > >> cleaner bug list? > > > > Hi, > > what about siutation package was removed from tree. After sometime > > other maintainer wants to put this package to the tree again, > > shouldn't fix those bugs before doing this? > > Marcin > > > > > > When package foobar gets removed from Portage, the remaining bugs > affecting foobar gets closed with resolution WONTFIX/OBSOLETE/FIXED > depending on type of the bug. > When package foobar gets readded to Portage, the maintainer needs to > check also for closed bugs. > That's how it is now, and the workflow wouldn't change with this proposal. > > So you are right, but irrelevant to the /topic in hand. > > - Samuli > >
The problem is that, in reality, some bugs are forgotten and are keep opened. Currently, I manually check for them, but it's sometimes hard to do this manually. The idea of generating a QA report (like others in http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/) would allow me to easily review that list periodically to check that obsolete bugs are closed.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
