Michał Górny posted on Sun, 03 Jun 2012 09:22:04 +0200 as excerpted: >> Even if only the files metatdata changes, that still adds a significant >> cost to an rsync. > > I wonder when it will come to the point where git will be more efficient > than rsync. Or maybe it would be already?
Handwavey guess, but I've figured git to be more efficient client-side for some time. Server-side I don't know about, but I've presumed that's the reason the switch-to-git plans haven't included switching the default for user-syncs to git. I expect user/client side, git would be more efficient already, but as I said, that's handwavey guesses. -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
