On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:07:01 +0200 Thomas Sachau <to...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Do you prefer having everything hardcoded in PMS or can you accept > outsourcing bigger code pieces into some sort of eclass (i am thinking > about some external code base, which can be duplicated by the package > manager with internal code, but has to be used, if the external eclass > has a newer version/revision then the duplicated internal code)?
The package manager mustn't require any particular eclass to be present, and there mustn't be duplication between eclasses and the package manager. > I am especially thinking about the setup of the environment and the > code details for the wrappers for binaries and headers, hardcoding > those details into PMS makes it hard to change/fix issues later on. Sounds like you haven't really got a clean design then. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
