El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 12:24 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 11:53 +0200, Peter Stuge escribió: > > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > > What is hurting is people demanding features without specifying what > > > the problem is > > > > Part of enabling progress is to show a strong will to communicate, > > with the goal of extracting common understanding from discussion. > > > > In any project based on volunteer effort you must show that you too > > are interested in giving, for anyone to give you anything. > > > > When it's not obvious that you want to receive - to the point where > > you drive the discussion (the horror!) in order to arrive at that > > point of common understanding - then people will be upset and look > > down on you, because dealing with you leaves too sour a taste behind. > > > > > > //Peter > > As Peter explains, I think it is now clear enough what I was demanding > (about clarifying what is needed to get things in next EAPI to prevent > issues like Tommy is suffering to get multilib stuff done), but I star > to think Ciaran thinks it's easier to simply wear a blindfold on to keep > thinking all what he says cannot be corrected at all, neither improved > and others must follow his instructions blindly
Ciaran, simply think that, if PMS team agrees with a doc explaining what needs to be provided and the procedure, you will also save time and not need to follow this tedious discussions, all parts will benefit for sure.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
