El sáb, 23-06-2012 a las 13:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: > On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:11:28 +0200 > Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Looks like you have now opted to use Brian's comment as a kind of > > "shield" of similar and discuss only about multilib, even when this > > thread was more general and we were talking to the problems shown in > > recent discussions (from forcing rebuilds issue, optional deps > > problems to some trivial questions like know where we can see what > > things are being worked out for eapi5). > > For optional deps, we're close to having two proposals. That's moving > forwards. Whether or not it will be in EAPI 5 depends solely upon > timing, and whether the Council ends up liking at least one of the two > proposals. > > For "forced rebuilds", there's a proposal already, and Zac has just > done implementation work, and most of the PMS patch was written ages > ago for kdebuild-1 and the original EAPI 3. So again, whether or not > that ends up in EAPI 5 is just a matter of timing and Council approval. > > For "what's being worked on", you just need to look at the PMS list. > > So I'm really not sure what your problem is there... >
Your cynicism, that is the problem I see
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
