+1 for verbosity
Il giorno 01/ago/2012 13:21, "hasufell" <hasuf...@gentoo.org> ha scritto: > > We already had a discussion about cmake-utils.eclass and forcing verbose > build log for that which was approved: > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_ce7d33748936663e84a5463fbf7f4d39.xml > > Also we have bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384193 and > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379497 > > I opened a tracker https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429308 > > Some devs seem unsure about that or want to have a council vote on that > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=429332 > > > When I sum that up again... > - we are on gentoo and need as much information as possible for > backtracing, resolving bugs, checking whether CFLAGS and such have been > respected > - no need to tell the user to recompile with > EXTRA_ECONF="--disable-silent-rules" or similar just to be able to help him > - some QA checks might depend on verbose build log and are not yet > implemented therefor > - if people want nice build _output_ (not log), they can use --quiet-build >
