On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:08:10 +0200 Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:24:12 +0200 > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chith...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > hasufell schrieb: > > > When I sum that up again... > > > - we are on gentoo and need as much information as possible for > > > backtracing, resolving bugs, checking whether CFLAGS and such have > > > been respected > > > - no need to tell the user to recompile with > > > EXTRA_ECONF="--disable-silent-rules" or similar just to be able to > > > help him > > > - some QA checks might depend on verbose build log and are not yet > > > implemented therefor > > > - if people want nice build _output_ (not log), they can use > > > --quiet-build > > > > Sorry that I am late to the party, but I would add some concerns to > > this discussion. > > > > Verbose build logs are can be several times as large as non-verbose > > ones, which can run into our Bugzilla's attachment size limit. When > > a user is unable to attach the build.log file, typically one of the > > following happens: > > About that -- maybe we should finally consider increasing it? > Nowadays, HTTP is able to handle transparent compression, so plain > text logs are pretty fine there. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430160 -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
